Recent research by Prof Veronica James, of the Australian
National University, Canberra, and colleagues from Japan and
America, suggest that testing a single hair fiber could be used
to reliably screen for breast cancer in women. Hair from breast
cancer patients has a different intermolecular structure to
hair from healthy subjects.
A brief letter reported initial results of a research experiment
on hair taken from women with breast cancer (James V, Kearsley
J, Irving T, Amemiya Y, Cookson D. Using hair to screen for
breast cancer. Nature 1999; Mar 4; 398(6722): 33-4). Prof
James
said: "Breast cancer screening is currently performed using
mammography which, though effective, is a costly, uncomfortable
and inconvenient test which limits its acceptability to many
of the female population at risk of developing breast cancer."
The team investigated the structure of hair by measuring the
way it scatters X-rays, a technique called X-ray diffraction.
The technique relied on an intense source of X-rays, called
synchrotron radiation. Both scalp and pubic hair were used,
the latter being less likely to have undergone treatments, such
as perming, that interfere with hair fiber structure. Hair taken
from women diagnosed with breast cancer revealed rings of X-ray
intensity in the diffraction pattern not seen in that of healthy
subjects' hair. Breast cancer is associated with a faulty gene
called BRCA1. All hair samples from women carrying a faulty
BRCA1 gene showed the same structural anomaly in their hair
fiber samples. Prof James said: "Our preliminary diffraction
studies of hair give the strongest clues to date that breast
cancer, or a predisposition to breast cancer, is strongly associated
with structural changes in human hair samples.
Prof James said: "Breast cancer screening is currently performed
using mammography which, though effective, is a costly, uncomfortable
and inconvenient test which limits its acceptability to many
of the female population at risk of developing breast cancer."
If the technique is backed by larger trials, it could have "revolutionary
implications" for detecting breast cancer. More extensive studies
currently underway may take up to three years to complete.
This discovery has the potential to replace screening by mammography
which is expensive and time consuming for both patients and
doctors. These disadvantages would be removed by the new test
using hair samples. However, if hair analysis is shown to be
effective as a screening test it would still be important to
give all women with a positive finding detailed counseling.
Potentially a hair sample can be sent by a local family doctor
to a central laboratory for testing. Results could be made available
in just a few days.
Analysis of hair fiber by X-ray diffraction has been used since
the late 1940s. It has helped us understand the chemical composition
of hair and to identify hair production defects that occur in
some diseases.